As previously analyzed, the California Supreme Court has approved the use of forum selection clauses, and such contractual clauses will be upheld absent a showing that enforcement would be unreasonable. See Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior Court, 17 Cal. 3d 491, 551 P.2d 1206, 131 Cal. Rptr. 374 (1976). Since that time, the issue of the validity of a forum selection clause has been litigated on several occasions. In a majority of the cases, the clauses have been upheld. However, in certain limited and narrow circumstances, the courts have found a forum selection clause to be unreasonable, and thus Read the rest…
CEO, SCOTT LETOURNEAU
Welcome to the Nevada Corporate Planners experience! As you know, 95% of business owners fail within 5 years, and our goal is to help you beat the odds! There is so much more involved with your business other than just forming an LLC or corporation. Our goal with our members section is for you to have access to the tools and resources to help you get off to a fast start to profits and protect your financial future. Your feedback is always welcome! JOIN NOW!
You will have access to fast start videos, teleseminars and other content to help your business get off to a fast start to profits. Whether you’re based in the U.S. or Internationally, you will find the tools and resources to help you run and operate your U.S. business. JOIN NOW!
FAST START TO PROFITS CHECKLIST™
Starting a business can be a daunting task filled with steps that are a must. You will receive access to our Fast Start to Profits Checklists™ to simplify the process whether you are starting a business from scratch or have formed an entity to protect real estate or other assets investments. All designed to help save you time and money! JOIN NOW!
You don't have to go it alone on the path to business success. Though you sometimes may have felt that you had nowhere to turn for help, you now have access to our special community of entrepreneurs who, like you, strive to succeed in business. You will be able to share insights, strategies, concepts, and distinctions with other members in our community platform. JOIN NOW!
In a normal limited partnership situation, if a judgment creditor of a limited partner wishes to collect on a personal debt, the creditor can only obtain a charging order, which gives the creditor only the rights of an assignee of the partnership interest. See Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 88.535. (The same holds true for a member of a limited liability company (LLC). NRS 86.401.)
Suppose a situation wherein the general partner was a corporation, and the owners of the corporation were also the limited partners. The laws of Nevada apparently will allow this. See NRS 88.469 (a “person” can be both a Read the rest…
It is a common occurrence in our litigious society for someone to face a lawsuit. If one loses such a lawsuit, can they lose their ownership in a business, even if the lawsuit did not involve the business in any way? Unfortunately, the answer is “yes.”
As a general rule, shares of stock in any type of corporation are personal property. See Keith Paul Bishop, Nevada Law of Corporations & BusinessOrganizations (Aspen Law & Business 1998), § 5.10 at 5-21. Similar to real property, all personal property is subject to execution by a judgment creditor against a judgment debtor, unless the particular property Read the rest…
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 can pose an unexpected liability for any property owner or operator of property if hazardous substances are released into the environment. If one fits within the statute they are liable, as the statute imposes strict liability and offers few defenses.
In recent years, several CERCLA cases have arisen affecting real estate in Ohio. One example is Stychno v. Ohio Edison Co., 806 F. Supp. 663 (N.D. Ohio 1992). Here, Stychno was the owner of a parcel of real estate in Warren, Ohio. Ohio Edison was a former owner of the Read the rest…
Liability under CERCLA is rather Draconian. Any person who “operates” a facility and pollutes it is liable, even if the person is “a saboteur who sneaks into the facility at night to discharge its poisons out of malice.” United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51, 65 (1998). Because of the nature of the statutory scheme, the discharge of even a minute amount of seemingly innocuous material can lead to liability. This is demonstrated by the following cases.
In Dartron Corp. v. Uniroyal Chem. Co., 917 F. Supp. 1173 (N.D. Ohio 1996), the plaintiff alleged that the defendant contaminated the property Read the rest…